https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:49750 Tue 30 May 2023 16:25:56 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:54234 Tue 13 Feb 2024 12:27:33 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:51330 Thu 31 Aug 2023 15:36:50 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:49333 Thu 11 May 2023 15:21:53 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:49208 Sun 07 May 2023 09:30:14 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:49373 6-month follow-up. Results: From 21 582 manuscripts identified, 107 RCT were included. Universities were the most common recruitment setting used in eighty-four studies (79 %). Less than half (46 %) of the studies provided sufficient information to evaluate whether individual recruitment strategies met sample size goals, with 77 % successfully achieving recruitment targets. Reporting for retention was slightly better with 69 % of studies providing sufficient information to determine whether individual retention strategies achieved adequate retention rates. Of these, 65 % had adequate retention. Conclusions: This review highlights poor reporting of recruitment and retention information across trials. Findings may not be applicable outside a university setting. Guidance on how to improve reporting practices to optimise recruitment and retention strategies within young adults could assist researchers in improving outcomes.]]> Fri 12 May 2023 13:45:28 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:50880 Fri 11 Aug 2023 14:43:30 AEST ]]>